YES, please. This post definitely lighten something that has been weighing me after my previous reblog. Yes please, thank you Matt Walsh to point out that Robin Thicke should not be excepted.
An argument may stand that the need for certain female population to strut, twerk, skimp is to grab attention as the result of male gaze and how they dominate the way women feels about their own body. Domination by men of how certain anatomic parts of women’s body is an object of an extravagant sexual journey which only existed for the pleasure of male.
Please read and consider this post, those whom we condemned and mocked upon are the result of upbringing by a culture, in this case, a culture of oppression and apathetic. Like the previous reblog, this post ends with an amazing letter to his son which I highly recommended.
***Update, August 1: In response to the thousands of people who, after reading this entire post, decided to harp on one single phrase (“I’m no feminist”), I wrote this. If you want to know how I can say all the things I say here, yet still reject “feminism,” click the link and I’ll explain. Otherwise, carry on. Thanks for stopping by.
Our country dangles on the precipice of starting a third World War. We are on the verge of a completely unnecessary conflict where the United States will fight along side Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood. This, in another day and age, might earn the crown as the Most Controversial Story of the Week. But we’re in the year 2013, and this is America, so a young pop star’s dance moves on an MTV awards show have predictably overshadowed the prospect of global chaos and bloodshed. I wrote…
View original post 1,262 more words